A phase III, multi-arm multi-stage covariate-adjusted response-adaptive randomized trial to determine optimal early mobility training after stroke (AVERT DOSE)

Author:

Bernhardt Julie1ORCID,Churilov Leonid2,Dewey Helen3,Donnan Geoffrey2ORCID,Ellery Fiona1,English Coralie4ORCID,Gao Lan5ORCID,Hayward Kathryn2ORCID,Horgan Frances6,Indredavik Bent7,Johns Hannah2,Langhorne Peter8,Lindley Richard9ORCID,Martins Sheila10,Ali Katijjahbe Md11,Middleton Sandy12ORCID,Moodie Marj5,Pandian Jeyaraj13ORCID,Parsons Brooke14,Robinson Thompson15,Srikanth Velandai16,Thijs Vincent17ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia

2. University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia

3. Eastern Health, Box Hill, VIC, Australia

4. University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia

5. Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia

6. Royal College of Surgeons, University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland

7. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway

8. Glasgow University, Glasgow, UK

9. Westmead Applied Research Centre, Australia and The George Institute for Global Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

10. Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, Brazil

11. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi, Malaysia

12. Australian Catholic University, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia

13. Christian Medical College, Ludhiana, India

14. Consumer, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

15. University of Leicester, Leicester, UK

16. Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

17. The Florey, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia

Abstract

Rationale: The evidence base for acute post-stroke rehabilitation is inadequate and global guideline recommendations vary. Aim: To define optimal early mobility intervention regimens for ischemic stroke patients of mild and moderate severity. Hypotheses: Compared with a prespecified reference arm, the optimal dose regimen(s) will result in more participants experiencing little or no disability (mRS 0–2) at 3 months post-stroke (primary), fewer deaths at 3 months, fewer and less severe complications during the intervention period, faster recovery of unassisted walking, and better quality of life at 3 months (secondary). We also hypothesize that these regimens will be more cost-effective. Sample size estimates: For the primary outcome, recruitment of 1300 mild and 1400 moderate participants will yield 80% power to detect a 10% risk difference. Methods and design: Multi-arm multi-stage covariate-adjusted response-adaptive randomized trial of mobility training commenced within 48 h of stroke in mild (NIHSS < 7) and moderate (NIHSS 8–16) stroke patient strata, with analysis of blinded outcomes at 3 (primary) and 6 months. Eligibility criteria are broad, while excluding those with severe premorbid disability (mRS > 2) and hemorrhagic stroke. With four arms per stratum (reference arm retained throughout), only the single treatment arm demonstrating the highest proportion of favorable outcomes at the first stage will proceed to the second stage in each stratum, resulting in a final comparison with the reference arm. Three prognostic covariates of age, geographic region and reperfusion interventions, as well as previously observed mRS 0–2 responses inform the adaptive randomization procedure. Participants randomized receive prespecified mobility training regimens (functional task-specific), provided by physiotherapists/nurses until discharge or 14 days. Interventions replace usual mobility training. Fifty hospitals in seven countries (Australia, Malaysia, United Kingdom, Ireland, India, Brazil, Singapore) are expected to participate. Summary: Our novel adaptive trial design will evaluate a wider variety of mobility regimes than a traditional two-arm design. The data-driven adaptions during the trial will enable a more efficient evaluation to determine the optimal early mobility intervention for patients with mild and moderate ischemic stroke.

Funder

National Health and Medical Research Council

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3