Moving stroke rehabilitation research evidence into clinical practice: Consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable

Author:

Eng Janice J1ORCID,Bird Marie-Louise12,Godecke Erin3ORCID,Hoffmann Tammy C4,Laurin Carole5,Olaoye Olumide A6,Solomon John7,Teasell Robert8,Watkins Caroline L9,Walker Marion F10

Affiliation:

1. Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

2. School of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Launceston, Australia

3. School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia

4. Centre for Research in Evidence-Based Practice, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia

5. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

6. Department of Medical Rehabilitation, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria

7. Department of Physiotherapy, School of Allied Health Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India

8. Parkwood Institute Research, Lawson Health Research Institute and Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada

9. University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK and Australian Catholic University, Sydney, Australia

10. School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

Abstract

Moving research evidence to practice can take years, if not decades, which denies stroke patients and families from receiving the best care. We present the results of an international consensus process prioritizing what research evidence to implement into stroke rehabilitation practice to have maximal impact. An international 10-member Knowledge Translation Working Group collaborated over a six-month period via videoconferences and a two-day face-to-face meeting. The process was informed from surveys received from 112 consumers/family members and 502 health care providers in over 28 countries, as well as from an international advisory of 20 representatives from 13 countries. From this consensus process, five of the nine identified priorities relate to service delivery (interdisciplinary care, screening and assessment, clinical practice guidelines, intensity, family support) and are generally feasible to implement or improve upon today. Readily available website resources are identified to help health care providers harness the necessary means to implement existing knowledge and solutions to improve service delivery. The remaining four priorities relate to system issues (access to services, transitions in care) and resources (equipment/technology, staffing) and are acknowledged to be more difficult to implement. We recommend that health care providers, managers, and organizations determine whether the priorities we identified are gaps in their local practice, and if so, consider implementation solutions to address them to improve the quality of lives of people living with stroke.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Neurology

Cited by 31 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3