Comparison of endoscopic and open surgery in life-threatening large spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage: A propensity-matched analysis

Author:

Lin Kun123ORCID,cheng Lin Zhi3,hai Tang Yin3,Wei De3,Gao Chuang12,Jiang Rongcai12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurosurgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China

2. Tianjin Neurological Institute, Key Laboratory of Post-Neurotrauma Neuro-repair and Regeneration in Central Nervous System, Ministry of Education in China and Tianjin, Tianjin, China

3. Department of Neurosurgery, Fujian Medical University Provincial Clinical Medical College, Fuzhou, China

Abstract

Background: Conventionally, open surgery (OS), including standard craniotomy (SC) and decompressive craniectomy (DC) with hematoma evacuation, is adopted to treat life-threatening large spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Recently, endoscopic surgery (ES), a minimally invasive surgical treatment, has gained increased popularity. However, the safety and efficacy of ES for life-threatening large ICH is uncertain. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ES for life-threatening large ICH and compare it with traditional OS. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and imaging data of consecutive supratentorial ICH patients with preoperative Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score ⩽ 8, who underwent ES or OS between May 2015 and October 2021. To minimize bias in case selection, propensity score matching was performed (ratio 1:2, caliper o.2). The primary outcome was a prognosis-based dichotomized (favorable or unfavorable) outcome of the 5-point Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at 6 months. Favorable outcome was defined as a GOS score of 4 to 5 at 6 months. Sensitivity analysis was also performed to ensure the robustness of the findings. Results: Of 695 patients who underwent surgical treatment for spontaneous ICH, 191 patients were identified to be eligible, with 58 patients in the ES group and 133 patients in the OS group. Propensity score matching improved covariate balance and generated a comparable cohort (53 ES and 106 OS) for all analyses. The ES group had a higher incidence of the primary outcome of favorable outcome at 6 months (ES 20/53 (37.7%) vs. OS 22/106 (20.8%); propensity score–matched relative risk (RR) (95% CI) = 1.74 (1.13–2.68); p = 0.013). Sensitivity analysis showed the result was stable. Conclusion: ES is a safe treatment for life-threatening large spontaneous supratentorial ICH patients and may achieve better outcomes than OS.

Funder

the Clinical Study of Tianjin Medical University

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3