Convergent Validity Between the Motor Domain of PediaTrac<sup>TM</sup> and <i>Ages and Stages</i> in Term and Preterm Infants at 2, 4, 6, and 9 Months of Age-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Convergent Validity Between the Motor Domain of PediaTrac^TM and Ages and Stages in Term and Preterm Infants at 2, 4, 6, and 9 Months of Age

Published:2024-04-05 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:1073-1911
Container-title:Assessment
language:en
Short-container-title:Assessment

Author:

Lasutschinkow Patricia C.¹^ORCID,Bo Jin¹,Warschausky Seth²,Raghunathan Trivellore²,Berglund Patricia²,Huth-Bocks Alissa³,Taylor H. Gerry⁴,Staples Angela D.¹,Cano Jennifer¹,Le Doux Gabrielle N.¹,Lukomski Angela¹,Larson Jennifer C. Gidley²,Lajiness-O’Neill Renée¹²^ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, USA

2. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA

3. Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA

4. The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA

Abstract

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the convergent validity of the Motor domain (MOT) of PediaTracTM v3.0, an online developmental tracking instrument based on caregiver reports, with fine and gross motor domains (ASQ-FM and ASQ-GM) of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ-3) in infants between 2- and 9 months of age. Participants were caregivers of 571 infants born term or preterm (gestational age <37 weeks) enrolled in a multi-site psychometric study of PediaTracTM. Findings revealed significant correlations between MOT and ASQ-3 scores at 2, 4, 6, and 9 months across time periods, term-preterm status, and biological sex. A significantly higher percentage of infants born preterm, compared with those born at term, was identified as a moderate or high risk on both the ASQ-3 and PediaTrac. Future investigations are warranted to further examine the psychometric properties of the MOT domain, including sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value.

Funder

Mildred E. Swanson Foundation

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Link

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/10731911241241144

Reference39 articles.

1. Agarwal P. K., Xie H., Rema A. S., Rajadurai V.S., Lim S. B., Meaney M., Daniel L. M. (2020). Evaluation of the Ages and Stages Queestionnaire (ASQ 3) as a developmental screener at 9, 18, and 24 months. Early Human Development, 147, 105081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105081

2. Agarwal P. K., Xie H., Rema A. S., Meaney M. J., Godfrey K. M., Rajadurai V. S., Daniel L. M. (2024). Concurrent validity of the ages and stages questionnaires with Bayley Scales of Infant Development-III at 2 years - Singapore cohort study. Pediatrics & Neonatology, 65(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedneo.2023.02.013

3. Armijo I., Schonhaut L., Cordero M. (2015). Validation of the Chilean version of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ-CL) in community health settings. Early Human Development, 91(12), 671–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EARLHUMDEV.2015.10.001

4. Baker B. L., McIntyre L. L., Blacher J., Crnic K., Edelbrock C., Low C. (2003). Pre-school children with and without developmental delay: Behaviour problems and parenting stress over time. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research: JIDR, 47(Pt 4–5), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1365-2788.2003.00484.X

5. Bornstein M. H., Hahn C. S., Suwalsky J. T. D. (2013). Physically developed and exploratory young infants contribute to their own long-term academic achievement. Psychological Science, 24(10), 1906–1917. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613479974