Sex Differences in Objective and Projective Dependency Tests: A Meta-Analytic Review

Author:

Bornstein Robert F.1

Affiliation:

1. Gettysburg College

Abstract

A meta-analysis of all studies published since 1950 wherein sex differences in subjects' scores on objective and/or projective dependency tests were assessed (N of studies = 97) revealed that (a) women of all ages consistently obtain higher dependency scores than do men on objective dependency tests; and (b) adult men obtain slightly higher scores than do adult women on projective dependency tests, but this sex difference is not obtained in younger (i.e., child and adolescent) subjects. Subsidiary analyses examined the impact of various mediating variables (e.g., clinical vs. nonclinical status of subjects) on observed sex differences in objective and projective dependency scores. Findings are discussed in the context of research on sex role socialization and dependency and within the framework of recent theoretical models that distinguish "implicit" from "self-attributed" dependency needs.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Applied Psychology,Clinical Psychology

Cited by 32 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3