Affiliation:
1. University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
Abstract
Documentation forms the basis in which museum collections are ascribed meaning. Practices, many of which are rooted in nineteenth century empiricist modes of thinking, have not been revised at the speed that ideological, practical, and technological transformations are taking place in other areas of museum practice. At this point an opportunity exists for radical changes not only in the manner objects are documented, but also the way they are perceived as forms of evidence. This article, drawing on the findings of the Knowledge Objects project and the writing of leading museum theorists, and historians revisits the acquisition and documentation process. It proposes the incorporation of new principles, practices, and structures that acknowledge objects as polysemic entities—as holding multiple meanings; the meaning of narratives and classificatory systems as products of cultural, disciplinary, museum, and curatorial opinion; the role of a diverse range of users in the cycle of knowledge making and the responsibilities of curators and collection managers as knowledge experts and brokers.
Reference13 articles.
1. CameronF. R. 2000. Shaping Maori Histories and Identities: Collecting and Exhibiting Maori Ma-terial Culture at the Auckland and Canterbury Museums, 1850s to 1920s. Ph.D. thesis, Massey University, New Zealand.
2. Wired collections — the next generation
3. Digital Futures I: Museum Collections, Digital Technologies, and the Cultural Construction of Knowledge
4. Museums and the Shaping of Knowledge
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献