Affiliation:
1. Southampton Oceanography Centre
2. University of Florida
3. Georgia State University
4. University of California, Santa Barbara
Abstract
The authors have developed and tested scale-up methods, based on a simple social network theory, to estimate the size of hard-to-count subpopulations. The authors asked a nationally representative sample of respondents how many people they knew in a list of 32 subpopulations, including 29 subpopulations of known size and 3 of unknown size. Using these responses, the authors produced an effectively unbiased maximum likelihood estimate of the number of people each respondent knows. These estimates were then used to back-estimate the size of the three populations of unknown size. Maximum likelihood values and 95% confidence intervals are found for seroprevalence, 800,000 ±43,000; for homeless, 526,000 ±35,000; and for women raped in the last 12 months, 194,000±21,000. The estimate for seroprevalence agrees strikingly with medical estimates, the homeless estimate is well within the published estimates, and the authors' estimate lies in the middle of the published range for rape victims.
Subject
General Social Sciences,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Reference30 articles.
1. Predicting the Reporting of Rape Victimizations
2. The measurement of family violence and rape by the redesigned national crime victimization survey
3. Bernard, H.R., E.C. Johnsen, P.D. Killworth, and S. Robinson. 1989. Estimating the size of an average personal network and of an event subpopulation In the small world, edited by M. Kochen, 159-75. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Cited by
93 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献