Affiliation:
1. American University of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
Abstract
Ascribed and achieved characteristics influence individuals’ positions in a social hierarchy. I explore how status characteristics and status ideologies influence expectations about economic opportunities in the United Arab Emirates, a wealthy, highly diverse, and internationally stratified society where beliefs in meritocracy are nationally supported. In Studies 1 and 2, participants reported the extent to which they perceived various characteristics to influence an individual’s salary. Participants whose nationality placed them higher in the economic hierarchy expected achieved markers of status to play a larger role than ascribed markers in determining pay. Across groups, the more participants believed in meritocracy, the more they expected achieved markers to play a role. In Study 3, participants predicted the economic success of individuals who varied in ascribed and achieved characteristics. Across participant groups, both ascribed and achieved characteristics were expected to influence an individual’s economic success. Taken together, results suggested that both ascribed and achieved characteristics are expected to influence an individual’s position in the socioeconomic hierarchy, but only differences rooted in achieved characteristics are legitimized. Group differences and implications for system stability are discussed.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Communication,Cultural Studies,Social Psychology
Reference44 articles.
1. Adler N., Stewart J. (2007). The MacArthur Scale of Subjective Social Status. https://www.macses.ucsf.edu/research/psychosocial/subjective.php
2. Amadeo K. (2021). Gulf Cooperation Council – GCC countries: Six rich countries that own the world’s oil. The Balance. https://www.thebalance.com/gulf-cooperation-council-3306357
3. Anderson C., Willer R., Kilduff G. J., Brown C. E. (2012). The origins of deference: When do people prefer lower status? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1077–1088. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0027409
4. Brandt M. J. (2013). Do the disadvantaged legitimize the social system? A large-scale test of the status-legitimacy hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 765–785. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031751
5. Byrne B. M., Shavelson R. J., Muthén B. O. (1989). Testing for equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial MI. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.456
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献