Affiliation:
1. Michigan State University
Abstract
The present research investigates the relative efficacy of several of the more prominent weighting schemes frequently noted in the delinquency literature. This article presents the initial methodology involved in the construction of a self-report instrument of delinquent behavior as well as the comparison of ten frequency and seriousness weighting schemes. Reliability was assessed through internal consistency and test-retest methodology. Validity was assessed through multitrait-multimethod analysis as well as by the relationship of the self-report data to official court and police data sets. Results reveal that the inclusion of weighting schemes did not strengthen the instrument or add to its applicability, suggesting that the more concise and efficient method of single categorical weights is a sufficiently powerful method of assessing self-reported estimates of delinquent behavior.
Subject
Law,General Psychology,Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. References;Handbook of Crime Correlates;2019
2. Scaling Criminal Offending;Journal of Quantitative Criminology;2011-12-23
3. Patterns of Residual Criminal Careers among a Sample of Adjudicated French-Canadian Males;Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice;2007-07
4. Desistance From Crime;Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice;2007-02
5. Differential Cost Avoidance and Successful Criminal Careers;Crime & Delinquency;2007-01