“Court Can Happen Anywhere”: Courtroom Workgroup Members’ Perceptions of the Challenges and Opportunities of a Transformed Workplace

Author:

Webster Elizabeth1ORCID,Huebner Beth m.2ORCID,Early Alessandra Milagros3,Torres Luis C.4

Affiliation:

1. Loyola University Chicago

2. Arizona State University

3. John Jay College of Criminal Justice

4. Temple University

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has initiated lasting changes in a traditionally staid and inert court system. This study employs a courtroom communities perspective to examine how courtroom workgroup members perceived COVID-19’s impact on their work, their workgroup relationships, and the future of criminal court procedures. It analyzes data from semi-structured interviews with 22 prosecutors, 17 defense attorneys, and 10 judges in Milwaukee, WI, and St. Louis, MO. We find that moving to virtual proceedings limited opportunities for informal interaction. The immediate impact was to upend the courtroom communities’ familiarity, proximity, and stability with implications for plea negotiations and case resolution. Nevertheless, most participants supported using virtual proceedings for certain types of court hearings. Public defenders were more likely than prosecutors, judges, or private defense attorneys to express concerns about technological difficulties for defendants. We conclude by discussing policy and practice implications and identifying areas for future research.

Funder

John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Law,General Psychology,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference67 articles.

1. Aequitas. (2020a). Statutory and constitutional speedy trial rights in the wake of COVID-19 pandemic: Missouri. https://innovativeprosecutionsolutions.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Missouri-Speedy-Trial-and-COVID-19-1.pdf

2. Aequitas. (2020b). Statutory and constitutional speedy trial rights in the wake of COVID-19 pandemic: Wisconsin. https://innovativeprosecutionsolutions.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Wisconsin-Speedy-Trial-and-COVID-19-1.pdf

3. Ariturk D., William C., Garrett B. (2020). Virtual criminal courts. University of Chicago Law Review Online. https://lawreviewblog.uchicago.edu/2020/11/16/covid-ariturk/

4. Arizona Supreme Court. (2021). Recommended remote and in-person hearings in Arizona State Courts in the post-pandemic world. National Center for State Courts. https://www.azcourts.gov/courtservices/Court-Services-Home/Remote-Appearances

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3