Treatment Court Staffs’ Perceptions in Support of the Use of Virtual Services in Court Post-Pandemic

Author:

O’Neil Meghan M.12ORCID,Andraka-Christou Barbara3,Kunkel Tara,Bryant Kristina4,Huynh Phil5,Ray Bradley6

Affiliation:

1. University of Michigan Law School

2. The Ohio State University

3. University of Central Florida

4. Rulo Strategies

5. Wayne State University

6. RTI International

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted traditional courthouse operations, resulting in the abrupt and extensive adoption of virtual court proceedings. To date, limited empirical research has evaluated virtual treatment courts. Utilizing a novel national survey administered to 358 treatment court team members, we examine support for and barriers to virtual courts. Tested barriers include (a) access to technology, (b) Wi-Fi/internet, (c) private space to use technology, (d) technological skill level, and (e) attitudes toward virtual services. Staff most commonly reported “high support” for the continuation of virtual court proceedings including both hearings and pre-court meetings, and few staff reported “low support.” Treatment court team members expressing technological barriers—faced by themselves or clients—were less likely to support ongoing virtual services. Our analysis offers timely insights into how treatment courts have been transformed by the pandemic and an appreciation of barriers to and support for virtual continuation post-pandemic.

Funder

National Institutes of Health (NIDA) for the project titled, “JCOIN Coordination and Translation Center Yr 3 - Rapid Response

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference61 articles.

1. Assurance Wireless. (n.d.). Lifeline free government phone program. https://www.assurancewireless.com/

2. Problem-Solving Courts: A Brief Primer

3. Berman G., Feinblatt J. (2002b). Problem-solving justice: A quiet revolution viewpoint. Judicature, 86(4), 182–183. https://www.innovatingjustice.org/publications/problem-solving-justice-quiet-revolution

4. Factors affecting front line staff acceptance of telehealth technologies: a mixed-method systematic review

5. Mapping the Digital Divide: Before, During, and After COVID-19

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3