What Do We Really Know About the Prevalence of Restrictive Housing? Illuminating the “Dark Figure” of the Most Extreme Forms of Incarceration

Author:

Brown Jennifer M.1ORCID,Mears Daniel P.1ORCID,Aranda-Hughes Vivian1ORCID,Siennick Sonja E.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Florida State University

Abstract

A signature feature of the get-tough era in American corrections has been the proliferation of restrictive housing (RH). Although sometimes equated with solitary confinement, this housing encompasses a variety of distinct forms of incarceration. They are unified by an emphasis on restricted movement and privileges—yet vary in their design and uses. Despite that fact, little is known about the prevalence of different forms of housing. To address this research gap, we use a case study of Florida policy and administrative records data to illuminate the variety of RH types and the varying prevalence of each. We then discuss the implications of the findings for the study of RH uses and impacts and for policy.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Law,General Psychology,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference58 articles.

1. Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation & Reentry. (2021). Department orders index. https://corrections.az.gov/reports-documents/adcrr-policies/department-orders-index

2. Association of State Correctional Administrators and the Arthur Liman Public Interest Program [ASCA-Liman]. (2016). Aiming to reduce time-in-cell: Reports from correctional systems on the numbers of prisoners in restricted housing and on the potential of policy changes to bring about reforms. Yale Law School. https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/area/center/liman/document/aimingtoreducetic.pdf

3. Beck A. J. (2015). Use of restrictive housing in U.S. prisons and jails, 2011-12. Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/urhuspj1112.pdf

4. Butler H. D., Griffin O. H., Johnson W. W. (2013). What makes you the “worst of the worst”? An examination of state policies defining supermaximum confinement. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 24(6), 676–694. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403412465715

5. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. (2021). Operations manual. https://www.cdcr.ca.gov/regulations/wp-content/uploads/sites/171/2021/05/DOM_2021_ADA.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3