Affiliation:
1. University of Liverpool, United Kingdom,
Abstract
The traditional view of the hypnotized person as someone in a state of automatism, possessed of transcendent powers, is still popular among the general public. This has obvious implications for legal issues concerning possible coercion through hypnosis and the use of hypnosis for interviewing witnesses. However, it is now the opinion of most researchers that hypnosis does not induce a state of automatism, and caution should be exercised when employing hypnotic procedures to facilitate memory. It is concluded that better progress will be made in countering public misconceptions about hypnosis, and in benefiting from research on the applications of hypnotic interviewing procedures, if more effort is made to use concepts and terminology that relate hypnotic phenomena to everyday behavior and experience.
Subject
Law,General Psychology,Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Reference128 articles.
1. Scientific Status of Refreshing Recollection by the Use of Hypnosis
2. Anderton, C.H. (1986). The forensic use of hypnosis. In F. A. De Piano & H. C. Salzberg (Eds.), Clinical applications of hypnosis (pp. 197-223). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
3. Antisocial and Criminal Acts Induced by "Hypnosis"
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献