Affiliation:
1. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
2. Suffolk University
3. University of Central Arkansas
Abstract
Probation has received relatively little research attention. In this exploratory two-study inquiry, we first analyzed quantitative data to identify factors driving probation revocation in Pulaski County, Arkansas, among 10,260 individuals (mostly male and African American) between 2015 and 2019 (Study 1). We found individuals with felony histories were significantly more likely to be revoked (aOR 17.2 for one or two convictions; aOR 25.1 for three or more convictions). Other predictors include lower education, younger age at first sentence, unemployment, and substance use. In Study 2, we conducted 20 in-depth qualitative interviews with 12 key stakeholders and 8 individuals with probation experience. We found that client financial instability, substance use and mental health disorders, stakeholder risk avoidance, officer caseload, and lack of accessible resources/services contributed to probation revocation. We conclude with recommendations for changes to probation policy and practice, including officer training, alternatives to incarceration, service expansion, and community engagement.
Subject
Law,General Psychology,Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Reference66 articles.
1. Arkansas Division of Community Correction. (2020). Annual reports. https://doc.arkansas.gov/parole-board/resources/publications/
2. The Associated Press. (2015). Arkansas Parole Board adopts changes for parole violators. Public Radio from UA Little Rock. https://www.ualrpublicradio.org/local-regional-news/2015-08-27/arkansas-parole-board-adopts-changes-for-parole-violators
3. Bonczar T. (1997). Characteristics of adults on probation, 1995. https://www.prisonpolicy.org/scans/bjs/cap95.pdf
4. Exploring the Black Box of Community Supervision
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献