Affiliation:
1. Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia,
2. Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
Abstract
Pseudoscience and questionable science are largely neglected problems in police and other law enforcement work. In this primer, the authors delineate the key differences between science and pseudoscience, presenting 10 probabilistic indicators or warning signs, such as lack of falsifiability, absence of safeguards against confirmation bias, and lack of self-correction, that can help consumers of the police literature to distinguish scientific from pseudoscientific claims. Each of these warning signs is illustrated with an example from law enforcement. By attending to the differences between scientific and pseudoscientific assertions, police officers and other law enforcement officials can minimize their risk of errors and make better real-world decisions.
Subject
Law,General Psychology,Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Reference116 articles.
1. Creating Suspects in Police Interviews1
2. Impediments to accurate clinical judgment and possible ways to minimize their impact.
3. Beyerstein, B.L. (1996). Graphology. In G. Stein (Ed.), The encyclopedia of the paranormal (pp. 309-324). Buffalo, NY: Prometheus.
Cited by
45 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献