Affiliation:
1. Department of Teaching and Learning, University of Central Arkansas, Conway, AR, USA
Abstract
This mixed-methods study investigated the pandemic's impact on gifted identification among Arkansas's demographic groups and gifted services. The provision of gifted services during the pandemic varied, leading to differences in instructional practices and technology access. Nomination and identification processes were disrupted, hindering the recognition of giftedness, especially among underrepresented populations, and this was reflected in the identification numbers. Participants indicated that the pandemic has led to decreased funding for gifted programs, reduced administrator support, less time for students to participate in gifted classes, and increased responsibilities for gifted teachers. These factors have left teachers feeling overwhelmed and resulted in decreased student engagement, more behavioral issues, and academic struggles. The diversion of resources and priorities away from gifted education further exacerbated the inequities in gifted programs.
Reference37 articles.
1. ADE (2009). Rules: Gifted and talented: Program approval standards. https://dese.ade.arkansas.gov/Files/20201223145241_2009_GT_Revised_Program_Approval_Standards.pdf
2. ADE Data Center (2023). Gift & talented by state. ADE. https://adedata.arkansas.gov/statewide/ReportList/State/GiftTalented.aspx?year=33&search=&pagesize=10
3. Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound
4. Charmaz K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed., pp. 150–161). Sage.
5. Twenty-Five Years of Research on the Lived Experience of Being Gifted in School