Affiliation:
1. Advertising, Public Relations & Media Design Department, University of Colorado-Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
Abstract
After the January 6th, 2021, riots at the U.S. Capitol, it seemed clear that the public sphere in the U.S. was being challenged by political extremists. Yet, existing public sphere normative theories provide unsatisfying tools for explaining why the riots occurred. Participants in the contemporary U.S. public sphere do not seem to recognize the legitimacy of their political opponents, and there is an increasing turn toward raw assertion instead of rational deliberation. In this essay, we discuss these shortcomings, focusing on how internet-mediated communication makes basic assumptions about legitimacy and rationality untenable. We settle on the concept of an “assertive turn” in the public sphere and analyze how anti-rationalism is becoming dominant in political discourse. We then argue for a scholarly reckoning with the social reality of 21st century U.S. politics—mainly that there are significant gaps in normative theory when it comes to addressing the assertive turn in the U.S. public sphere.
Subject
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Communication,Cultural Studies
Reference57 articles.
1. Neoliberalism, the public sphere, and a public good
2. Three dimensions of the public sphere on Facebook
3. Agonistic Pluralism and Journalism: De-centering Dominant Journalistic Norms
4. Bump P. (2021). Half of Republicans incorrectly think there’s evidence Biden didn’t win legitimately. The Washington Post, April 30. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/04/30/half-republicans-incorrectly-think-theres-evidence-biden-didnt-win-legitimately/
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献