Affiliation:
1. Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA
2. West Point, NY, USA
3. Georgetown University, Washington, D.C., USA
Abstract
Scholars have contended that norms of professionalism are critical to understanding how militaries interact with civilian leaders and when they intervene in politics. Yet, few studies have directly examined the normative structures of military officers. Through a survey of 1468 US Military Academy cadets, this study evaluates cadets’ views toward professionalism, and in particular what is often presumed to be the dominant framework of those norms based on Samuel Huntington’s The Soldier and the State. We identify five patterns of normative beliefs based on cadets’ views of civil–military interaction and the nonpartisan ethic: orthodox, unorthodox, inconsistent, non-committal, and motivated norms. Cadets fall into each of these categories, but approximately one-quarter demonstrate motivated norms, adhering when convenient, and otherwise dispensing with them when the rules they prescribe clash with their partisan identities. These findings, especially our novel conceptualization on norm adherence, contribute to a greater understanding of military culture and professionalism.
Subject
Safety Research,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Sociology and Political Science
Reference72 articles.
1. Babcock-Lumish B (2013). Uninformed, not uniformed? The apolitical myth (p. 48-56). Military Review, (September/October).
2. Pitfalls of Professionalism? Military Academies and Coup Risk
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献