Exclusion of the non-English-speaking world from the scientific literature: Recommendations for change for addiction journals and publishers

Author:

Bahji Anees1ORCID,Acion Laura2ORCID,Laslett Anne-Marie3,Adinoff Bryon4

Affiliation:

1. University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; and British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

2. University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA; and University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

3. La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

4. University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, Colorado, USA

Abstract

Background: While English is only the native language of 7.3% of the world's population and less than 20% can speak the language, nearly 75% of all scientific publications are English. Aim: To describe how and why scientific contributions from the non-English-speaking world have been excluded from addiction literature, and put forward suggestions for making this literature more accessible to the non-English-speaking population. Methods: A working group of the International Society of Addiction Journal Editors (ISAJE) conducted an iterative review of issues related to scientific publishing from the non-English-speaking world. Findings: We discuss several issues stemming from the predominance of English in the scientific addiction literature, including historical drivers, why this matters, and proposed solutions, focusing on the increased availability of translation services. Conclusion: The addition of non-English-speaking authors, editorial team members, and journals will increase the value, impact, and transparency of research findings and increase the accountability and inclusivity of scientific publications.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Policy,Health (social science)

Reference42 articles.

1. How to Choose a Journal: Scientific and Practical Considerations

2. Caveat Emptor: Predatory Publishers, Rogue Journals, and the Potential Corruption of Addiction Science

3. Bender E. M., Gebru T., McMillan-Major A., Shmitchell S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 610–623). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery (FAccT ‘21). https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922.

4. Burton K. D. (2021). The scientific and technological advances of World War II. The National WWII Museum. https://www.nationalww2museum.org/war/articles/scientific-and-technological-advances-world-war-ii

5. Central Intelligence Agency. (2021). Field listing – Languages. Central Intelligence Agency. https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/field/languages/.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3