Health services in Nordic welfare states: Introducing a new category of providers through the Norwegian free treatment choice reform

Author:

Lindén Tord Skogedal1ORCID,Ervik Rune1

Affiliation:

1. NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Norway

Abstract

Aim: We contribute to the literature on private provision of health care in Nordic countries by studying developments following the 2015 Norwegian free treatment choice reform. The reform introduced new providers of publicly financed health care. These new private for-profit or not-for-profit providers are licensed by Helfo (the Norwegian Health Economics Administration) to offer pre-defined services at pre-defined prices. They treat patients referred to specialist health care given that patients choose these providers. We focus on multidisciplinary specialist substance treatment and mental health care, areas constituting 78% of reform costs in 2019. Methods and data: We discuss three sets of questions with statistics, documents, and interview data: What developments and consequences of new providers did key actors expect? What developments of Helfo-licensed providers do we see and why? How have Helfo-licensed providers influenced collaboration between public and non-public providers and recruitment? Results: Contrary to expectations, we found that most Helfo-licensed providers have not previously collaborated with public providers through tender agreements. This complicates collaboration. So far, the establishment of new providers has not undermined public providers in terms of recruitment. Conclusion: Public providers with Helfo-licensed providers in their area still experience some pressure on recruitment and express concerns for future negative reform consequences. The introduction of new private providers may influence the level of market-orientation in the Norwegian welfare state.

Funder

Norges Forskningsråd

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Policy,Health (social science)

Reference37 articles.

1. Competition among health care providers: helpful or harmful?

2. Hvem bruker «Fritt behandlingsvalg»?

3. Bogen H., Grønningsæter A. B. (2016). En ideell forskjell? Om ideelle aktører i spesialisthelsetjenesten [An ideal exception? On NGOs in specialized care]. Fafo rapport 2016: 30. Fafo.

4. Using thematic analysis in psychology

5. Competition policy for health care provision in Norway

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Impacts of Norway's extended free choice reform on waiting times and hospital visits;Health Economics;2024-01-10

2. Motives underlying the intentions of youth to get involved in bribery: evidence from Lithuania;International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy;2023-12-15

3. Digital screens and children;Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs;2022-09-18

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3