Affiliation:
1. Department of Philosophy, University of Basel, Switzerland,
Abstract
Bruno Latour has had a tremendous impact on the field of science studies.Yet, it is not always easy to say what he stands for. Indeed, Latour has often claimed that his work lacks any overall unity. In this essay, I suggest that at least one concept remains constant throughout Latour’s diverse studies of modern science and technology, namely, mediation. I try to make good this claim by focussing on Latour’s numerous attempts over the years to distance himself from, so as to discredit, the philosopher Martin Heidegger. I argue that Latour’s repeated denunciations of Heidegger amount to a systematic tactic of dissimulation: by suppressing the substance of Heidegger’s critique of modern technoscience, Latour directs attention away from the not insignificant weaknesses in his own theory of mediation. Against the backdrop of an appropriately reconstructed Heidegger, Latour’s self-promotion as a radically progressive non-modern thinker cannot be sustained.
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,General Social Sciences,History
Reference46 articles.
1. Alderman, Harold G. ( 1973) ‘The Work of Art and Other Things’, in E. G. Ballard & C. E. Scott (eds), Martin Heidegger: In Europe and America (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff): 157-69.
2. Book Review : Surely You Are Joking, Monsieur Latour!Science in Action, by Bruno Latour. Milton Keynes: Open University Press: 1987, 274 pp. $25.00. Also available in paper from Harvard University Press, $12.95
3. Discussion
4. We Have Never Been Modern. Bruno Latour , Catherine Porter
5. Crease, Robert, Don Ihde, Casper Bruun Jensen & Evan Selinger ( 2003) ‘Interview with Bruno Latour’, in D. Ihde & E. Selinger (eds), Chasing Technoscience: Matrix for Materiality ( Bloomington: Indiana University Press): 15-26.
Cited by
35 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献