Affiliation:
1. Department of History, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA
Abstract
This essay reviews four recent studies representing a new direction in the history of pharmaceuticals and pharmaceutical science. To this end, it introduces the notion of a symbolic economy of drugs, defined as the production, circulation, and reception of signs that convey information about drugs and establish trust in them. Each of the studies under review focuses on one key signifier in this symbolic economy, namely the brand, the patent, the clinical trial, and the drug itself. Drawing on Pierre Bourdieu’s theory of the economy of symbolic goods, I conceptualize these signifiers as symbolic assets, that is, as instruments of communication and credit, delivering knowledge, carrying value, and producing authority. The notion of a symbolic economy is offered with a threefold intention. First, I introduce it in order to highlight the implications of historical and anthropological work for a broader theory of the economy of drugs, thus suggesting a language for interdisciplinary conversations in the study of pharmaceuticals. Second, I deploy it in an attempt to emphasize the contributions of the recent scholarship on drugs to a critical understanding of our own contemporary ways of organizing access to drugs and information about drugs. Finally, I suggest ways in which it might be of use to scholars of other commodities and technologies.
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,General Social Sciences,History
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Transnationalizing Critical Drug Studies;Engaging Science, Technology, and Society;2022-12-28
2. The Legal Molecule;Law, Culture and the Humanities;2019-10-16
3. Compromised Agency: The Case of BabyLegs;Engaging Science, Technology, and Society;2017-09-28
4. The Role of Patients;Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America;2017-08
5. New venues in STS;Social Studies of Science;2016-02