Affiliation:
1. Institute for Science in Society, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
Abstract
Wildlife field guide books present salient features of species, from colour and form to behaviour, and give their readers a vocabulary to express what these features look like. Such structures for observation, or observational grids, allow users to identify wildlife species through what Law and Lynch have called ‘the difference that makes the difference’. In this article, we show how these grids, and the characteristics that distinguish species, change over time in response to wider concerns in the community that use and make the field guides. We use the development of Dutch field guides for dragonflies to show how the ethics of observing wildlife, the recreational value of dragonfly observation, the affordances of observational tools, and biodiversity monitoring and conservation goals all have repercussions for how dragonflies are to be identified. Ultimately, this affects not only how dragonflies are to be observed and identified, but also what is taken to be ‘out there’. The article is based on a transdisciplinary cooperation between a dragonfly enthusiast with emic knowledge and access, and an STS researcher. We hope the articulation of our approach might inspire analyses of other observational practices and communities.
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,General Social Sciences,History
Reference71 articles.
1. Audubon J. J. (1827–1838). The birds of America from drawings made in the United States and their territories.
2. Beaulieu A. (2000). The space inside the skull: Digital representations, brain mapping and cognitive neuroscience in the decade of the brain [Thesis]. Universiteit van Amsterdam.