Affiliation:
1. University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Abstract
In the Netherlands as elsewhere, the overriding message of most dieting advice is that a person who wants to lose weight needs to overrule the desires of her craving body. Her mind has to put itself in a sovereign position and make ‘good choices’ about what to eat. But there are many ways of doing so. Linking up with different traditions within nutrition science, different dieting techniques enact different versions of food and concern themselves with different bodies. The ideals they strive after and the dangers they warn against are different, too. In short, they incorporate different ontonorms. At the same time, in all the ‘mind your plate’ advice, however varied, bodies figure as endowed with a nature that is problematic under the present cultural circumstances. This is in contrast with advice to ‘enjoy your food’, that targets a body that is not naturally given, but deserves to be cultivated. As I bring out the details of the discrepancies between the ontonorms embedded in different kinds of dieting advice, the term ‘ontonorms’ serves as a methodological tool. It helps to focus the analysis. But this article does not provide a ‘theory of ontonorms’, instead it argues for theoretical fluidity and specificity.
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,General Social Sciences,History
Cited by
199 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Contributors;Eating Is an English Word;2024-08-30
2. Bibliography;Eating Is an English Word;2024-08-30
3. Notes;Eating Is an English Word;2024-08-30
4. Differences and Appreciations;Eating Is an English Word;2024-08-30
5. Settling on an Okay Meal: An English Eater between Appeals and Apprehensions;Eating Is an English Word;2024-08-30