Local Health Department Values and Organizational Authorities Guiding Cross-Sector Work During COVID-19

Author:

Johnson Karl1ORCID,Biddell Caitlin B.1,Gora Combs Katherine1,Wiesman John1,Valdes Lupi Monica2,Hassmiller Lich Kristen1

Affiliation:

1. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

2. The Kresge Foundation, Troy, MI, USA

Abstract

Objective The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the role that local health departments (LHDs) have in cross sector can address alone, including the work of value alignment and the strategic use of organizational authorities. The practices by which LHDs used their authorities to conduct cross-sector work during the pandemic need exploration. Method We conducted semi-structured interviews with 19 public health leaders from metropolitan LHDs across the United States. Our interview guide assessed the values that LHD leadership prioritized in their cross-sector work as well as the range of organizational authorities they leveraged to influence external decision-making in other sectors. Results We found that LHDs approached cross-sector work by leaning on diverse values and authorities, each with unique implications for their work. The LHDs emphasized their approach to value alignment on a sector-by-sector basis, strategically using diverse organizational authorities—economic, political, moral, scientific, and logistical. While each authority and value we assessed was present across all interviewees, how each shaped action varied. Internally, LHDs emphasized certain authorities more than others to the degree that they more closely aligned with prioritized core values. Conclusion Our findings highlight the ongoing need for LHD leadership to improve their ability to effectively communicate public health values and the unique authorities by which health-supporting work can be facilitated, including how this message must be adapted, depending on the specific sectors with which the LHD needs to partner and the governance arrangement in which the LHD is situated.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Nursing (miscellaneous),Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference25 articles.

1. Policy instruments at work: A meta‐analysis of their applications

2. American Public Health Association. (2019). Public health code of ethics. APHA Code of Ethics (pp. 1–34). https://www.apha.org/-/media/files/pdf/membergroups/ethics/code_of_ethics.ashx

3. The COVID-19 wicked problem in public health ethics: conflicting evidence, or incommensurable values?

4. Soft and hard governing tools

5. Reimagining Public Health in the Aftermath of a Pandemic

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3