Affiliation:
1. RAND Corporation
2. Syracuse, New York.
3. University of South Carolina–Columbia.
4. Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences Medical School, Department of Psychiatry.
5. South Carolina Department of Alcohol
6. Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation
7. Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation (PIRE); American Public Health Association; Board of the Society for Prevention Research.
Abstract
Getting to Outcomes: Methods and Tools for Planning, Evaluation, and Accountability (GTO) was developed as a hands-on guide to help practitioners plan, implement, and evaluate their programs to achieve results. The GTO manual uses worksheets and case examples to guide practitioners in answering 10 accountability questions about needs and resources, goals, evidencebased practices, fit, capacity, plan, implementation, outcome evaluation, continuous quality improvement, and sustainability. Addressing these questions will help programs achieve positive outcomes because the accountability questions include the elements of successful programming. GTO is thought to be most effective when implemented as a system in which all the stakeholders (e.g., funders, program operators, evaluators) follow the GTO model together. This article briefly describes the GTO model and the accountability questions and provides an example of a statewide initiative that is using the GTO model in a comprehensive grant-making system.
Subject
Nursing (miscellaneous),Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献