The Role of Institutional Trust in Industry, Government, and Regulators in Shaping Perceptions of Risk Associated with Hydraulic Fracturing in the United Kingdom

Author:

Stretesky Paul B.1ORCID,Short Damien2,Stamford Laurence3

Affiliation:

1. Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

2. University of London, London, UK

3. The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Abstract

This study draws upon concepts of institutional trust and expendability to examine perceptions of risk associated with hydraulic fracturing or “fracking.” To study trust and risk, we collected data from a nationally representative sample of U.K. residents and analyzed it using multivariate regression. Perceptions of trust are measured for the oil and gas industry, central government, local government, and regulators while perceived risks are measured for seismicity, water quality, and hydraulic fracturing in general. Participants with high levels of trust in the oil and gas industry tend to perceive lower levels of risk associated with hydraulic fracturing. Levels of government and regulator trust are, however, largely unrelated to perceived risks. Importantly, trust in the oil and gas industry appears to mediate the relationship between political affiliation and perceptions of risk. Implications for theories of recreancy and environmental justice are explored.

Funder

Natural Environment Research Council

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Sociology and Political Science

Reference85 articles.

1. Environmental Hazards, Health, and Racial Inequity in Hazardous Waste Distribution

2. Constructing Environmental (in)Justice: Transatlantic Tales

3. Exploring support for shale gas extraction in the United Kingdom

4. The structure of attitudes towards shale gas extraction in the United Kingdom

5. Aryee Feizel. 2019. “Psychosocial Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing in Lancashire, England.” Proquest: 2570123114. PhD Dissertation, Department of Sociology, Northumbria University.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3