Affiliation:
1. Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada
Abstract
This article makes the case that electric micromobilities (EMMs) are the site of a moral panic and employs the lens of mobility justice to explain it. Through analysis of scholarly and media discourse, interviews with, and social media content produced by, EMM riders (eriders), and the auto ethnographic experiences of the lead author as an electric unicycle rider in daily life, as a participant in online and offline “erider” communities, and as a food delivery worker, we reinforce the conclusion that alternate mobilities face an uphill battle in gaining legitimacy and inclusion in transportation policy and infrastructure. While this is not a new finding—alternate mobilities have a long history of being demonized and excluded—this article offers insight into how individuals who find themselves unwitting scapegoats in conflicts over public space consciously engage in deliberate actions to resist EMM panic and achieve greater mobility justice.
Funder
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference140 articles.
1. A comparative analysis of e-scooter and e-bike usage patterns: Findings from the City of Austin, TX
2. Moving Boarders
3. Emergency department visits for electric scooter-related injuries after introduction of an urban rental program
4. Balsamini Dean. 2022. “Electric Unicyclists Having a Wheely Good, Illegal Time in NYC.” New York Post, June 25. Retrieved August 3, 2023 (https://nypost.com/2022/06/25/electric-unicyclists-are-having-a-wheely-good-albeit-illegal-time-in-nyc/).