rTMS for Poststroke Pusher Syndrome: A Randomized, Patient-Blinded Controlled Clinical Trial

Author:

Meng Lijiao12ORCID,Ge Yanlei12,Tsang Raymond C.C.3,Zhang Wenyue1,Liu Xingyu1,Li Siyi1,Zhao Jingyu1,Zhang Xiaoyue1,Wei Qingchuan12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China

2. Key Laboratory of Rehabilitation Medicine in Sichuan Province, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China

3. Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China

Abstract

Background Patients with poststroke pusher syndrome (PS) require longer duration of rehabilitation and more supplemental care after discharge. Effective treatment of PS remains a challenge. The role of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for PS has not been examined. Objective Assess the efficacy of rTMS for patients with poststroke PS in reducing pushing behavior, enhancing motor recovery and improving mobility. Methods A randomized, patient- and assessor-blinded sham-controlled trial with intention-to-treat analysis was conducted. Thirty-four eligible patients with poststroke PS were randomly allocated to receive either rTMS or sham rTMS for 2 weeks. Pushing behavior on the Burke lateropulsion scale and scale for contraversive pushing, motor function on Fugl-Meyer assessment scale-motor domain (FMA-m) and mobility on modified Rivermead mobility index were measured at baseline, 1 and 2 weeks after intervention. Repeated-measures analysis of covariance was used for data analysis. Results There was no significant interaction between intervention and time on Burke lateropulsion scale ( F = 2.747, P = .076), scale for contraversive pushing ( F = 1.583, P = .214), or change of modified Rivermead mobility index ( F = 1.183, P = .297). However, a significant interaction between intervention and time was observed for FMA-m ( F = 5.464, P = .019). Post hoc comparisons of FMA-m show better improvement in rTMS group with mean differences of 12.7 (95% CI −7.3 to 32.7) and 15.7 (95% CI −4.6 to 36.0) at post-treatment week 1 and week 2 respectively. Conclusions rTMS did not demonstrate significant efficacy in improving pushing behavior and mobility in patients with PS. However, rTMS might have potential effect in enhancing motor function for patients with PS. Registration: The study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration No. ChiCTR2200058015 at http://www.chictr.org.cn/searchprojen.aspx ) on March 26, 2022.

Funder

National Key Research and Development Program of China

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3