Comparative Effectiveness of Combined and Single Neurostimulation and Traditional Dysphagia Therapies for Post-Stroke Dysphagia: A Network Meta-Analysis

Author:

Banda Kondwani Joseph12,Wu Ko-Chiu3,Jen Hsiu-Ju14,Chu Hsin56,Pien Li-Chung78,Chen Ruey147,Lee Tso-Ying19,Lin Sheng-Kai10,Hung Shih-Han101112,Chou Kuei-Ru14131415ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei

2. Endoscopy Unit, Surgery Department, Kamuzu Central Hospital, Lilongwe, Malawi

3. Department of Interaction Design, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei

4. Department of Nursing, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei

5. Institute of Aerospace and Undersea Medicine, School of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei

6. Department of Neurology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei

7. Post-Baccalaureate Program in Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei

8. Psychiatric Research Center, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei

9. Nursing Research Center, Department of Nursing, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei

10. Department of Otolaryngology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei

11. International Master/PhD Program in Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei

12. Department of Otolaryngology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei

13. Research Center in Nursing Clinical Practice, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei

14. Psychiatric Research Center, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei

15. Neuroscience Research Center, Taipei Medical University, Taipei

Abstract

Background Comparative therapeutic benefits of combined and single neurostimulation therapies including neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES), pharyngeal electrical stimulation (PES), repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), and traditional dysphagia therapy (TDT) remain unknown in post-stroke dysphagia (PSD) rehabilitation. Therefore, we performed the first network meta-analysis (NMA) to determine comparative effectiveness of combined and single neurostimulation and traditional dysphagia therapies for PSD. Methods A frequentist NMA model was performed with therapy effect sizes presented as standardized mean differences (SMD) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for therapy comparisons while netrank function ranked the therapies in R-Software. Meta-regression models for study characteristics were analyzed using Bayesian NMA Model. Results Overall, 50 randomized controlled studies with 2250 participants were included. NMES + TDT 3.82 (95% CI, 1.62-6.01), tDCS + TDT 3.34 (95% CI, 1.09-5.59), rTMS + TDT 3.32 (95% CI, 1.18-5.47), NMES 2.69 (95% CI, 0.44-4.93), and TDT 2.27 (95% CI, 0.12-4.41) demonstrated very large effect in improving swallowing function. NMES + TDT −0.50 (95% CI, −0.68 to −0.32, rTMS + TDT −0.44 (95% CI, −0.67 to −0.21), TDT −0.28 (95% CI, −0.46 to −0.10), and NMES −0.19 (95% CI, −0.34 to −0.04) demonstrated medium to small effect in reducing pharyngeal transit time (PTT). rTMS −0.51 (95% CI, −0.93 to −0.08) demonstrated medium effect in reducing oral transit time (OTT). No significant therapy comparison differences were found for reducing aspiration/penetration. The highest ranked therapy was NMES + TDT for better swallowing function and reduction of PTT, rTMS for reduction of OTT, and tDCS + TDT for reduction of aspiration/penetration. Therapeutic effects of the therapies were moderated by frequency, sessions, and duration. Conclusion Combined therapies including NMES + TDT, tDCS + TDT, and rTMS + TDT demonstrate better therapeutic effect for improved swallowing function and reduction of PTT, OTT, and aspiration/penetration for PSD.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3