Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Measurements Differ Depending on Stabilization Techniques

Author:

Wilk Kevin E.1,Reinold Michael M.2,Macrina Leonard C.1,Porterfield Ron3,Devine Kathleen M.4,Suarez Kim5,Andrews James R.6

Affiliation:

1. From Champion Sports Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama

2. the Boston Red Sox and Massachusetts General Hospital, Sports Medicine Division, Boston, Massachusetts

3. the Tampa Bay Rays, St. Petersburg, Florida

4. Advanced Health Systems, Sarasota, Florida

5. NovaCare Physical Therapy, Tampa, Florida and

6. Andrews Sports Medicine and Orthopaedic Center, Birmingham, Alabama

Abstract

Background:The loss of glenohumeral internal rotation range of motion in overhead athletes has been well documented in the literature. Several different methods of assessing this measurement have been described, making comparison between the results of studies difficult.Hypothesis:Significant differences in the amount of internal rotation range of motion exist when using different methods of stabilization.Study Design:Descriptive laboratory study.Methods:Three techniques were used bilaterally in random fashion to measure glenohumeral internal rotation range of motion: stabilization of the humeral head, stabilization of the scapula, and visual inspection without stabilization. An initial study on 20 asymptomatic participants was performed to determine the intrarater and interrater reliability for each measurement technique. Once complete, measurements were performed on 39 asymptomatic professional baseball players to determine if a difference existed in measurement techniques and if there was a significant side-to-side difference. A 2-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used.Results:While interrater reliability was fair between all 3 methods, scapular stabilization provided the best intrarater reliability. A statistically significant difference was observed between all 3 methods ( P < .001). Internal rotation was significantly less in the dominant shoulder than in the nondominant shoulder ( P < .001).Conclusion:Differences in internal rotation range of motion measurements exist when using different methods. The scapula stabilization method displayed the highest intrarater reproducibility and should be considered when evaluating internal rotation passive range of motion of the glenohumeral joint.Clinical Relevance:A standardized method of measuring internal rotation range of motion is required to accurately compare physical examinations of patients. The authors recommend the use of the scapula stabilization method to assess internal rotation range of motion by allowing normal glenohumeral arthrokinematics while stabilizing the scapulothoracic articulation.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3