Telemedicine-delivered treatment for substance use disorder: A scoping review

Author:

Pham Huyen1ORCID,Lin Chunqing1,Zhu Yuhui1,Clingan Sarah E1,Lin Lewei (Allison)23,Mooney Larissa J14,Murphy Sean M5ORCID,Campbell Cynthia I67,Liu Yanping8,Hser Yih-Ing1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA

2. Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA

3. VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, USA

4. VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, USA

5. Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA

6. Center for Addiction and Mental Health Research, Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, USA

7. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, USA

8. Center for Clinical Trials Network, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, USA

Abstract

Introduction The COVID pandemic prompted a significant increase in the utilization of telemedicine (TM) for substance use disorder (SUD) treatment. As we transition towards a “new normal” policy, it is crucial to comprehensively understand the evidence of TM in SUD treatment. This scoping review aims to summarize existing evidence regarding TM's acceptability, quality, effectiveness, access/utilization, and cost in the context of SUD treatment in order to identify knowledge gaps and inform policy decisions regarding TM for SUDs. Method We searched studies published in 2012–2022 from PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and other sources. Findings were synthesized using thematic analysis. Results A total of 856 relevant articles were screened, with a final total of 42 articles included in the review. TM in SUD treatment was perceived to be generally beneficial and acceptable. TM was as effective as in-person SUD care in terms of substance use reduction and treatment retention; however, most studies lacked rigorous designs and follow-up durations were brief (≤3 months). Telephone-based TM platforms (vs video) were positively associated with older age, lower education, and no prior overdose. Providers generally consider TM to be affordable for patients, but no relevant studies were available from patient perspectives. Conclusions TM in SUD treatment is generally perceived to be beneficial and acceptable and as effective as in-person care, although more rigorously designed studies on effectiveness are still lacking. Access and utilization of TM may vary by platform. TM service quality and costs are the least studied and warrant further investigations.

Funder

National Institute on Drug Abuse

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Informatics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3