A randomised trial of real-time video counselling for smoking cessation among rural and remote residents

Abstract

Introduction Despite its reach, very limited evidence exists on the effectiveness of real-time video counselling for smoking cessation (e.g. via Skype). This study compared the effectiveness of real-time video counselling for smoking cessation to (a) telephone counselling; and (b) a control among rural and remote residents. Methods Between 25 May 2017 and 3 March 2020, a three-arm, parallel group, randomised trial, randomised 1244 rural and remote residents from New South Wales, Australia who smoked tobacco to: video counselling (4–6 video sessions); telephone counselling (4–6 telephone calls); or a control (printed materials). The primary outcome was 7-day point prevalence abstinence at 13 months post-baseline. Secondary outcomes were point prevalence abstinence at 4 months and 7-months post-baseline, prolonged abstinence, quit attempts, anxiety and depression. Results For the primary outcome of 7-day point prevalence abstinence at 13 months post-baseline, there was no significant difference between video counselling and telephone counselling (14.6% vs 13.3%; (OR = 1.11, 95% CI (0.75–1.64), P = 0.61) or video counselling and control (14.6% vs 13.9%; (OR = 1.06, 95% CI (0.71–1.57), P = 0.77). For secondary outcomes at 4 months post-baseline, the video counselling group had significantly higher odds than the control of 7-day point prevalence abstinence (14.3% vs 8.2%; OR = 1.88, 95% CI (1.20–2.95), P = 0.006) and 3-month prolonged abstinence (4.9% vs 2.2%; OR = 2.28, 95% CI (1.03–5.07), P = 0.04). There were no significant differences for other secondary outcomes. Discussion Video counselling increased smoking cessation in the short-term compared to a control although strategies to improve its long-term effectiveness are needed. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, https://www.anzctr.org.au ACTRN12617000514303.