Scoping review of telehealth use by Indigenous populations from Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States

Author:

Moecke Débora Petry12ORCID,Holyk Travis3,Beckett Madelaine12,Chopra Sunaina12,Petlitsyna Polina1,Girt Mirha4,Kirkham Ashley1,Kamurasi Ivan12,Turner Justin12ORCID,Sneddon Donovan12,Friesen Madeline1,McDonald Ian1,Denson-Camp Nathan1,Crosbie Stephanie1,Camp Pat G.12

Affiliation:

1. University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, Canada

2. Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

3. Carrier Sekani Family Services, Prince George, Canada

4. Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

Abstract

IntroductionTelehealth has the potential to address health disparities experienced by Indigenous people, especially in remote areas. This scoping review aims to map and characterize the existing evidence on telehealth use by Indigenous people and explore the key concepts for effective use, cultural safety, and building therapeutic relationships.MethodsA search for published and gray literature, written in English, and published between 2000 and 2022 was completed in 17 electronic databases. Two reviewers independently screened retrieved records for eligibility. For included articles, data were extracted, categorized, and analyzed. Synthesis of findings was performed narratively.ResultsA total of 321 studies were included. The most popular type of telehealth used was mHealth (44%), and the most common health focuses of the telehealth interventions were mental health (26%) and diabetes/diabetic retinopathy (13%). Frequently described barriers to effective telehealth use included concerns about privacy/confidentiality and limited internet availability; meanwhile, telehealth-usage facilitators included cultural relevance and community engagement. Although working in collaboration with Indigenous communities was the most frequently reported way to achieve cultural safety, 40% of the studies did not report Indigenous involvement. Finally, difficulty to establish trusting therapeutic relationships was a major concern raised about telehealth, and evidence suggests that having the first visit-in-person is a potential way to address this issue.ConclusionThis comprehensive review identified critical factors to guide the development of culturally-informed telehealth services to meet the needs of Indigenous people and to achieve equitable access and positive health outcomes.

Funder

Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Informatics

Reference263 articles.

1. World Health Organisation. Human rights and health [Internet]. Geneva, Switzerland, https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/human-rights-and-health (2020, accessed 10 October 2022).

2. Canada truth and reconciliation comission: honouring the truth, reconciling for the future: summary of the final report of the truth and reconciliation commission of Canada. Winnipeg (CA), https://nctr.ca/records/reports/#trc-reports (2015, accessed 16 August 2022).

3. Reconciliation Australia: Truth Telling Symposium Report [Internet]. Healing Foundation, https://www.reconciliation.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Truth-telling-symposium-report-2018-web.pdf (2018, accessed 10 October 2022).

4. Hayward J, Wheen N. The Waitangi Tribunal: Te Roopu Whakamana i te Tiriti o Waitangi. Wellington, NZ: Bridget Williams Books, 2016, p.572.

5. Federal Government of the United States: Apology to the Native Peoples of the United States [Internet]. Washington, https://www.congress.gov/bill/111th-congress/senate-joint-resolution/14/text (2010, accessed 10 October 2022).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3