Abstract
Karl Polanyi’s analysis in The Great Transformation has played a prominent role in shaping our understanding of the nature and outcome of both globalization and the movements that have emerged to resist it. However, this article argues that Polanyi’s account of the rise and demise of Europe’s 19th-century market system is, in important respects, incomplete and misleading. Its central concern is Polanyi’s neglect of class structures and processes and how this leads him to mischaracterize both the international and domestic institutions of Europe’s 19th-century market system, and the central dynamic driving its development and ultimate collapse. The article critically reviews key features of Polanyi’s analysis. Based on this review, it then presents a re-reading of the history of Europe’s unregulated market system. Finally, it considers the implications of this alternative account for how we view the context and conditions for globalization and the ways it can best be resisted or shaped in less destructive ways.
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference20 articles.
1. THE FAILURE OF SOCIAL REFORM: 1918‐1920
2. Brundage, Anthony (1974) ‘ The English Poor Law of 1834 and the Cohesion of Agricultural Society ’, Agricultural History 48(July): 405–417 .
3. The Creation of Nobles in Prussia, 1871-1918
4. de Benoist, Alain (1996) ‘ Confronting Globalization ’, Telos 108(Summer): 117–138 .
5. Glyn, Andrew (1995) ‘ Social Democracy and Full Employment ’, New Left Review 211: 33–55 .
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献