Comparative Sensitivity Analysis on Intersection Crash Prediction Models by Control Type: Highway Safety Manual Approach

Author:

Dadvar Seyedehsan1ORCID,Dimaiuta Michael2ORCID,Lim In-Kyu3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. CYFOR Technologies LLC, Federal Highway Administration, Geometric Design Laboratory, Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center, McLean, VA

2. Genex Systems LLC, Federal Highway Administration, Geometric Design Laboratory, Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center, McLean, VA

3. Office of Safety and Operations R&D, Federal Highway Administration, Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center, McLean, VA

Abstract

A comprehensive, in-depth investigation into the comparative safety of different intersection control types is presented, specifically signalized and minor road stop-controlled intersections across facility types. Employing a rigorous sensitivity analysis, the study scrutinizes intersection crash prediction models (CPMs) rooted in the Highway Safety Manual (HSM) methodology. Through meticulous data analyses and thorough comparisons of predictive models across a range of major and minor road traffic volumes, the paper critically examines the portrayal of signalized and stop-controlled intersections within the default HSM Part C CPMs. Additionally, the study delves into the effects of certain crash modification factors on CPMs, further exploring the impacts of calibration factors and locally developed models on crash prediction results. CPMs for signalized intersections do not uniformly lead to fewer crashes compared with stop-controlled intersections, especially under certain traffic volumes and when considering fatal and injury crashes. Therefore, the choice of intersection control should be based on more nuanced criteria than traffic volume alone. Additionally, the research emphasizes the role of intersection geometry and operations, for example, the benefits of adding turn lanes and varying left-turn phasing, in influencing safety outcomes. This study significantly contributes to the understanding of intersection safety and HSM modeling approaches, providing a valuable resource for transportation professionals dedicated to advancing intersection safety. Examining strengths and limitations of existing models provides valuable input for researchers developing future intersection CPMs, and offers essential insights for transportation planners and engineers, informing decision-making for optimizing intersection control strategies and enhancing overall intersection safety and traffic management.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference18 articles.

1. Highway Safety Manual - Supplement. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Washington, D.C., 2014.

2. Transportation Research Board (TRB). NCHRP 17-71A - Proposed AASHTO Highway Safety Manual, Second Edition. 2023. https://apps.trb.org/cmsfeed/TRBNetProjectDisplay.asp?ProjectID=5043. Accessed July 21, 2023.

3. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Intersection Control Evaluation. 2023. https://highways.dot.gov/safety/intersection-safety/ice. Accessed July 21, 2023.

4. Safety Prediction Models for Six-Lane and One-Way Urban and Suburban Arterials

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3