Feasibility of using Mastic for Performance Grading in Place of Extraction using SPS10 Mixtures

Author:

Azari Haleh1,Mohseni Alaeddin1,Steger Richard2,Muncy Dennis2

Affiliation:

1. Pavement Systems LLC, Bethesda, MD

2. Ingevity, Tulsa, OK

Abstract

Because of the increased use of reclaimed asphalt pavement, reclaimed asphalt shingles, rejuvenators, and other additives, performance of asphalt mixtures can no longer be guaranteed by controlling properties of the binder. To determine the effect of additives on asphalt performance, the current procedure is to extract the binder from the mixture using solvents and recover the binder by removing the solvent. This is a two-step procedure, which can be time consuming and costly and which requires chemicals considered hazardous unless used with special care. Another issue is the quality of the extracted binder, as the process of dissolving the binder and recovering it from chemicals may affect the properties of the extracted binder. In this study, we suggest the use of mastic separated from the mixture, in place of extraction. The fine portion of the mixture (particles less than 0.25 mm) is physically separated from the mixture without use of solvents. This material is called composite mastic since it includes effects from all additives on the binder. The process of preparing composite mastic is significantly faster and less costly than extracting the binder. The separated mastic is tested following the Unified Performance Tests by incremental Method (UPTiM) using a dynamic shear rheometer to determine the high-, low-, and intermediate-temperature performance grades, similar to those of asphalt binder. This study shows strong correlations between properties of composite mastic, extracted asphalt, and asphalt mixture. Therefore, testing mastic could be a reliable alternative to testing extracted binder and compacted mixture.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Mechanical Engineering,Civil and Structural Engineering

Reference26 articles.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3