User Perceptions of the Quality of Service on Shared Paths

Author:

Hummer Joseph E.1,Rouphail Nagui2,Hughes Ronald G.23,Fain Shannon J.2,Toole Jennifer L.4,Patten Robert S.4,Schneider Robert J.4,Monahan John F.5,Do Ann6

Affiliation:

1. Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7908.

2. Institute for Transportation Research and Education, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8601.

3. Highway Safety Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27514.

4. Toole Design Group, 4603 Calvert Road, College Park, MD 20740.

5. Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8203.

6. Office of Safety Research and Development, Turner–Fairbank Highway Research Center, FHWA, McLean, VA 22101.

Abstract

Shared-use paths are becoming increasingly busy across the United States. Path designers need guidance on how wide to make new or rebuilt paths and on whether to separate the different types of users. The current guidance is not specific, has not been calibrated to conditions in the United States, and does not accommodate the range of modes found on a typical path. The purpose of this project, sponsored by FHWA, was to develop a level-of-service (LOS) estimation method for shared-use paths that overcomes these limitations. The focus of this paper is on the collection of the perceptions of path users and the development of a model relating those perceptions to operational and path variables. Companion papers describe the efforts made to develop equations explaining path operations and to develop an LOS estimation tool based on the perception model. For this effort, the project team collected the perceptions of 105 volunteers viewing 36 video clips from 10 paths. Analysis showed that variables related to path operations and the path width had the strongest relationships to the overall quality of the trail experience. The recommended model for overall rating included terms for path width, the number of meeting and passing events, and the presence of a centerline. The model was statistically sound; it should be easy to use. Analysts should be able to use the model and the procedure for determination of the LOS, which is based on the model, with confidence, knowing that it is well grounded on the perceptions of a large sample of trail users.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Mechanical Engineering,Civil and Structural Engineering

Reference9 articles.

Cited by 18 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3