Changes in Travel Behavior, Attitudes, and Preferences among E-Scooter Riders and Nonriders: First Look at Results from Pre and Post E-Scooter System Launch Surveys at Virginia Tech

Author:

Buehler Ralph1,Broaddus Andrea2,Sweeney Ted3,Zhang Wenwen4,White Elizabeth5,Mollenhauer Mike5

Affiliation:

1. Urban Affairs and Planning, Virginia Tech Research Center, Arlington, VA

2. Ford Motor Company, Palo Alto, CA

3. Spin, San Francisco, CA

4. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ

5. VTTI, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA

Abstract

Shared micromobility such as electric scooters (e-scooters) has the potential to enhance the sustainability of urban transport by displacing car trips, providing more mobility options, and improving access to public transit. Most published studies on e-scooter ridership focus on cities and only capture data at one point in time. This study reports results from two cross-sectional surveys deployed before ( n = 462) and after ( n = 428) the launch of a fleet of shared e-scooters on Virginia Tech’s campus in Blacksburg, VA. This allowed for a pre–post comparison of attitudes and preferences of e-scooter riders and nonusers. E-scooter ridership on campus followed patterns identified in other studies, with a greater share of younger riders, in particular undergraduate students. Stated intention to ride before system launch was greater than actual ridership. The drop-off between prelaunch intention to ride and actual riding was strongest for older age groups, women, and university staff. As in city surveys, the main reasons for riding e-scooters on campus were travel speed and fun of riding. About 30% indicated using e-scooters to ride to parking lots or to access public transport service, indicating their potential as a connector to other modes of transport. Perceptions about convenience, cost, safety, parking, rider behavior, and usefulness of the e-scooter systems were more positive among nonriders after system launch, indicating that pilot projects may improve public perceptions of e-scooters. Building more bike lanes or separate spaces for e-scooters could help move e-scooter riders off sidewalks—a desire expressed by both pedestrians and e-scooter users.

Funder

U.S. Department of Transportation’s University Transportation Centers Program

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Mechanical Engineering,Civil and Structural Engineering

Reference16 articles.

1. NHTS. National Household Travel Survey. 2017. https://nhts.ornl.gov/vehicle-trips. Accessed July 11, 2020.

2. Sanders R. L., Branion-Calles M., Nelson T. A. To Scoot or Not to Scoot: Findings from a Recent Survey about the Benefits and Barriers of using E-Scooters for Riders and Non-Riders. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 139, 2020, pp. 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.07.009.

3. ATLDOT. Atlanta E-Scooter Survey Results. Altalnta Department of Transportation, GA, 2019. https://www.atlantaga.gov/home/showdocument?id=45981.

4. BCDOT. Baltimore City Dockless Vehicle Program Annual Evaluation Report: Permit Year 1. Baltimore City Department of Transportation, MD, 2020. https://transportation.baltimorecity.gov/sites/default/files/Year%202%20evaluation%20Report%20APPENDIX%202%20FINAL.pdf.

5. CDOT. E-Scooter Pilot Evaluation. Chicago Department of Transportation, IL, 2020. https://www.chicago.gov/content/dam/city/depts/cdot/Misc/EScooters/E-Scooter_Pilot_Evaluation_2.17.20.pdf.

Cited by 41 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3