Corridor-Level Auto Occupancy in Mobility Monitoring Efforts: A Crash-Based Approach

Author:

Xu Yiqing1ORCID,Dougald Lance E.2ORCID,Miller John S.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA

2. Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, VA

Abstract

Vehicle occupancy (the number of persons per vehicle) is fundamental to evaluations of transportation system performance focused on the movement of people rather than solely vehicles. Historically, obtaining detailed estimates of occupancy has required manual (expensive) field data collection. This paper reports on a crash-based approach for estimating occupancy. Because some characteristics, such as the presence of multiple passengers aged 16 to 21, may affect the likelihood of crash involvement, the study examined ways to control possible crash bias using two methods. The first—heuristic bias correction, which entails synthesizing missing samples—is useful for smaller jurisdictions where there is no ground truth value readily available but an area-wide occupancy measure is needed. The second—statistical bias correction, which uses manual observations for calibration followed by the creation of a model—is suitable for obtaining occupancy at the corridor level. The approach is demonstrated with 12 years of fall and spring crash data for the Hampton Roads region of southeastern Virginia, U.S., representing 1.7 million people and 50,000 crashes. Testing showed estimated occupancies were within roughly 0.05 of true occupancy when corridor-specific calibration was performed. Further, the larger number of samples used for an area-wide occupancy means that heuristic bias correction is not always necessary: for cities with more than 200 samples, the difference between uncorrected and corrected occupancies was 0.02. For states that report the number of occupants for crashes with and without injury, this approach holds promise for estimating vehicle occupancy for both corridors and regions.

Funder

Virginia Department of Transportation

Federal Highway Administration

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference28 articles.

1. Liu K. Estimation and Prediction of Average Vehicle Occupancies Using Traffic Accident Records. Doctoral dissertation, Florida International University, Miami, 2007. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1040&context=etd. Accessed November 11, 2021.

2. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Travel Model Validation and Reasonability Checking Manual, 2nd ed. Cambridge Systematics, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2010. https://connect.ncdot.gov/projects/planning/tpb%20training%20presentations/fhwa%20model%20validation%20handbook.pdf. Accessed November 11, 2021.

3. Factors affecting CO2 emissions from private automobiles in Japan: The impact of vehicle occupancy

4. Capital District Transportation Committee. Placing the Congestion Management Process in the Context of Metropolitan Transportation Planning Goals and Objectives. Capital District Transportation Committee, Albany, New York, 2009. https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop09043/fhwahop09043.pdf. Accessed June 15, 2022.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3