Perceived Safety and Security Barriers to Walking and Bicycling: Insights from Milwaukee

Author:

Schneider Robert James1ORCID,Wiers Hayley2ORCID,Schmitz Andrew3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Urban Planning, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI

2. School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ

3. Office of Comprehensive Planning, City of Memphis, Memphis, TN

Abstract

Two broad categories of barriers to improving pedestrian and bicycle transportation are concerns about traffic safety and personal security. Gathering residents’ perceptions of these barriers can help public agencies develop effective and equitable strategies to create more sustainable transportation systems. We analyzed open-ended responses to the 2020 Milwaukee Safe and Healthy Streets survey to identify common traffic safety barriers (e.g., driver behavior such as speeding and red-light-running) and personal security barriers (e.g., undesirable street behaviors such as gun violence, robbery, and assault) to walking and bicycling. Then, we developed binary logistic models to identify perceptions of neighborhood characteristics, and individual demographic characteristics related to perceiving walking or bicycling as unsafe with respect to traffic or personal security. For walking, respondents’ traffic safety concerns were most strongly associated with perceptions of fast neighborhood traffic speeds, and personal security concerns were associated with perceptions of poor neighborhood cleanliness. For bicycling, both traffic safety concerns and personal security concerns were most strongly associated with poor neighborhood opportunities for exercise. At an individual level, living in a zero-vehicle household and having self-reported poor health were associated with rating traffic safety for both walking and bicycling as unsafe; having disabilities was associated with rating walking as unsafe. In almost every aspect of our analysis, respondents living in lower-income communities reported greater barriers to pedestrian and bicycle safety and security than residents from wealthier neighborhoods. The results emphasized the importance of both the social and physical environment for improving pedestrian and bicycle transportation.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Mechanical Engineering,Civil and Structural Engineering

Reference39 articles.

1. United Nations Environment. Global Outlook on Walking and Cycling. UN Environment, 2016. https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/17030/globalOutlookOnWalkingAndCycling.pdf. Accessed July 22, 2021.

2. National Association of City Transportation Officials. Global Street Design Guide. NACTO, 2016. https://nacto.org/publication/global-street-design-guide/. Accessed July 22, 2021.

3. World Health Organization. Global Status Report on Road Safety. WHO, 2018. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565684, Accessed July 22, 2021.

4. International Transport Forum. Best Practice for Urban Road Safety: Case Studies. ITF, 2020. https://www.itf-oecd.org/sites/default/files/docs/best-practice-urban-road-safety.pdf. Accessed July 22, 2021.

5. League of American Bicyclists. Bicycling & Walking in the United States. Benchmarking Report. 2018. https://bikeleague.org/benchmarking-report. Accessed July 22, 2021.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3