Affiliation:
1. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
2. Siemens Mobility Inc., Austin, TX
Abstract
Adaptive traffic control systems (ATCSs), have been in use since the late 1970s but have only received significant attention in the U.S. during the last 10 years. Since 2008, the number of these systems has increased by more than 600%. A brief literature review clearly shows a shortage of comprehensive studies that gather data from numerous field evaluations, categorize those evaluations based on several factors, summarize findings, and develop meaningful conclusions. This study addresses this gap by presenting a framework and a tool which enable comprehensive analysis of ATCSs deployed and evaluated in the U.S. Compared with some previous studies, where the focus was on brief and general experiences with ATCSs, the tool presented in this study allows detailed analysis of ATCS deployments and investigation of numerous criteria important for their evaluations. Relevant ATCS data from deploying agencies and literature are collected, discussed, and used to populate a database of the Assessment Tool for Adaptive Traffic Control ([AT]2C). The main purpose of (AT)2C is to help practitioners and researchers to identify, compare, and assess statistics of relevant ATCS technologies, mainly from the perspective of their field benefits.
Funder
National Cooperative Highway Research Program
Subject
Mechanical Engineering,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference22 articles.
1. Fehon K., Peters J. Adaptive Traffic Signals, Comparison and Case Studies. Institute of Transportation Engineers Western ITE Meeting, San Francisco, CA, p. 10.
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献