Estimating Pedestrian Volumes for Signalized and Stop-Controlled Intersections

Author:

Le Minh1,Geedipally Srinivas R.2,Fitzpatrick Kay3,Avelar Raul E.3

Affiliation:

1. Texas A&M Transportation Institute, Dallas, TX

2. Texas A&M Transportation Institute, Arlington, TX

3. Texas A&M Transportation Institute, College Station, TX

Abstract

Pedestrian fatal crashes in the U.S. have increased over the years. From 2007 to 2016, pedestrian fatalities increased 27% nationally, while all other traffic fatalities decreased 14%. On average, a pedestrian was killed every 1.5 h in traffic crashes in 2016. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has been working with public agencies toward developing more data-driven approaches to identify and mitigate pedestrian safety issues. However, pedestrian exposure to risk is not readily available. The absence of pedestrian exposure data makes it challenging to identify and prioritize high-crash risk locations. Using Dallas, Texas, as a case study, researchers wanted to use exposure in relation to volumes—both vehicular and pedestrian volume—to determine pedestrian risk. Although the vehicular volume is extensively available, the pedestrian volume is seldom available. The objective of this study is to explore options for collecting or estimating pedestrian volume data, particularly at intersections with high pedestrian activity. Researchers successfully developed a direct-demand model that estimates pedestrian volumes at signalized and stop-controlled intersections. The final model showed that pedestrian volume: increases 4 times within downtown; increases 12% per school within 1 mi of intersection; increases 4.8 times per 1% increase in commercial/multi-family residential land uses within 300 ft of intersection; increases 4.7 times with presence of higher education, hospitals, or malls; and decreases 36% per 5 mph increase in the intersections’ maximum posted speed limit. This research can help advance pedestrian safety analyses by providing a method of estimating pedestrian volumes for intersections by control type, particularly when volumes are infeasible to measure.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Mechanical Engineering,Civil and Structural Engineering

Reference8 articles.

1. Turner S., Sener I., Martin M., White L. D., Das S., Hampshire R., Colety M., Fitzpatrick K., Wijesundera R. Guide for Scalable Risk Assessment Methods for Pedestrians and Bicyclists. FHWA-SA-18-032. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2018.

2. Facility-Demand Models of Peak Period Pedestrian and Bicycle Traffic: Comparison of Fully Specified and Reduced-Form Models

3. Comparison of Pedestrian Count Expansion Methods: Land Use Groups versus Empirical Clusters

4. Development and Application of Volume Model for Pedestrian Intersections in San Francisco, California

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Campus environmental quality and streetscape features related to walking activity;Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering;2023-06-12

2. Estimating Pedestrian Crossing Volumes and Crashes at Midblock Locations;Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board;2022-04-15

3. Varying influences of the built environment on daily and hourly pedestrian crossing volumes at signalized intersections estimated from traffic signal controller event data;Journal of Transport Geography;2021-05

4. Development and Validation of a Seven-County Regional Pedestrian Volume Model;Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board;2021-02-17

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3