Proposed Framework for Identifying and Predicting Operator Errors When using Advanced Vehicle Technologies

Author:

Pradhan Anuj K.1,Pai Ganesh1,Radadiya Jaydeep1,Knodler Michael A.2,Fitzpatrick Cole2,Horrey William J.3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA

2. Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA

3. AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, Washington, DC

Abstract

Advanced vehicle technologies include systems that are defined by the Society for Automotive Engineers as automated driving features or driver support features. The latter are increasingly available in late model vehicles in the form of advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS). ADAS features remove some responsibilities from drivers, but still depend on the drivers for safe operation. This can result in drivers committing errors while using ADAS, especially if their understanding of these systems, that is, their mental model, is incorrect. To understand how these systems could be used incorrectly it is necessary to have an insight into these mental models. One approach is to characterize users’ mental representations of systems based on the errors that they commit during system use. Such an approach necessitates a classification of potential errors that may be committed, and the underlying cognitive and behavioral reasons for such errors. To that end, a framework is proposed that can, among other goals, help predict user errors while using ADAS based on human factors and task analysis techniques. A methodology is detailed for mapping operator-system interactions using state diagrams, error identification techniques using task analysis are proposed, and a categorization scheme based on classic error taxonomies is described. This proposed framework can subsequently be expanded for error identification for a wider range and versions of ADAS, as well as for future automated driving systems (ADS). Moreover, the framework provides a systematic approach that can be used toward operationalizing mental models, forming the basis for structured user training, and for human-centered design of advanced vehicle technologies.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Mechanical Engineering,Civil and Structural Engineering

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3