An Exploratory Comparative Analysis of Northern Plains Grain Shippers’ Perspective on Whether Operational Performance Translates into Service Quality in Freight Rail Transportation

Author:

Ndembe Elvis1,Vachal Kimberly2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Management and Marketing, Prairie View A&M University, Prairie View, TX

2. Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND

Abstract

The aim of this study is to assess whether railroad operational performance indictors translate into service quality. We achieved this by using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test to compare grain shippers’ perceptions of rail service with a pooled cross-section of survey data between 2008 and 2018 in North Dakota, U.S., involving six service dimensions: marketing and sales, timely delivery of equipment, car ordering alternatives/process, condition of equipment, availability of order information, and access to marketing personnel. The analysis is undertaken with an underlying assumption that shippers’ expectations about rail service are low. Results indicate that differences in freight rail service quality can be better explained by differences between railroads compared to differences within railroads over time. Gaps exist between shippers’ expectations and perceptions of freight rail service. It appears that some freight railroads have been able to exceed shippers’ service expectations by providing higher freight service quality than would be expected. Results suggest that the service quality of a shortline freight railroad is affected by its affiliated Class I freight railroad when comparing service quality as perceived by shortline freight railroad shippers. Although operational performance indicators including dwell time and train speed are frequently used to reflect service quality because of the dearth of knowledge about rail freight service quality, these operational performance indicators do not necessarily reflect service quality. The quality of freight rail service should be based on shippers’ perception or the gap between shippers’ perceptions and expectations.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Mechanical Engineering,Civil and Structural Engineering

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3