Head Start in Time or in Space? Determining Needed Leading Pedestrian Interval Length as a Function of Intersection Layout

Author:

Saeidi-Razavi Ray1ORCID,Furth Peter2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Cambridge Systematics Inc., Medford, MA

2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA

Abstract

Where signalized pedestrian crossings run concurrently with vehicles, the permitted conflict between right-turning vehicles and pedestrians can be mitigated by giving pedestrians a head start. With a head start, pedestrians can establish themselves in the crosswalk before right-turning traffic can get there, reinforcing pedestrians’ priority and engendering better motorist yielding behavior. In some U.S. cities, it is becoming common to give pedestrians a head start “in time” by means of a leading pedestrian interval (LPI); however, pedestrians can also be given a head start “in space” using corner bulbouts, setback stoplines, and other protected intersection features that increase the distance from the pedestrian stopline to the vehicle stopline. A model was developed for determining the necessary LPI length as a function of an intersection’s corner geometry. Model elements include determining the path of a right-turning vehicle, defining the conflict zone, determining maximum vehicle speed, and modeling vehicle acceleration, so that vehicle and pedestrian time to reach the conflict zone can be determined. Application to a particular intersection showed that with (a) traditional corner geometry, (b) corner bulbouts added, and (c) a protected intersection layout, necessary LPI was 3.7, 1.1, and 0 s, respectively. The benefits of replacing an LPI with a head start in space included greater vehicle capacity and reduced cycle length, which in turn reduced pedestrian-, transit-, and vehicle delay and improved pedestrian compliance. To fully achieve these benefits, the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices should consider eliminating its recommended minimum of 3 s for an LPI.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Mechanical Engineering,Civil and Structural Engineering

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3