Comparative Analysis of AERMOD-Predicted Pollutant Concentrations by Input Source Type in Atlanta, GA

Author:

Lu Hongyu1ORCID,Liu Haobing2ORCID,Kim Daejin3ORCID,Xia Tian4,Dai Ziyi5ORCID,Reichard William1ORCID,Zhao Yingping6,Guin Angshuman1ORCID,Rodgers Michael O.1,Guensler Randall1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA

2. College of Transportation Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China

3. Department of Urban Planning and Real Estate, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung City, Gangwon Province, South Korea

4. GlaxoSmithKline (China) Investment Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China

5. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institution of Technology, Atlanta, GA

6. Department of Internet Intelligence, Peng Chang Laboratory, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China

Abstract

This research investigates the differences in AERMOD-predicted pollutant concentrations across input source types (AREAPOLY, VOLUME, LINE, RLINE, and RLINEXT without barriers). AERMOD (version 19191) microscale dispersion modeling is performed for the Atlanta I-75/I-575 Northwest Corridor (NWC) subarea in the U.S., including freeway corridors, managed lanes, connecting arterials, and intersections serving the NWC system. Modeling is performed for all link-receptor pairs, for each hour of the year, using the approved AERMET meteorological files (24 h × 365 days in 2019) from Georgia Environmental Protection Division (GA EPD), and emissions rates are estimated using MOVES-Matrix, based on predicted speed and volume by hour (output from ARC’s ABM2020 travel demand model). The AERMOD comparative analyses are performed for the same receptor sets, link-level volumes and speeds, and fleet compositions, across the five source types to generate comparative model results by input source type for the subarea. Results indicate concentrations from RLINEXT and RLINE were similar, with differences smaller than 0.05%, and their results were significantly higher than other source types. The results from AREAPOLY were similar to those from LINE (both smaller than RLINE and RLINEXT results). It is indicated that the results from VOLUME are systematically different from AREAPOLY and LINE for both downwind (much lower than AREAPOLY and LINE) and upwind (much higher than AREAPOLY and LINE) of the sources, and the sensitivity analysis indicates these predictions occur when wind speeds are low (less than approximately 2.5 m/s), which is because the enhanced wind meander approach employed with VOLUME is different from other source types.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Mechanical Engineering,Civil and Structural Engineering

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3