Gestalt contexture and contested motives: Understanding video evidence in the murder trial of Officer Michael Slager

Author:

Watson Patrick G1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Wilfrid Laurier University, Canada

Abstract

This article is situated in ongoing discussions about the influx of images of police violence. To date, much scholarship has centred on Foucauldian notions of knowledge-power and sousveillance. Alternatively, I attend to how video evidence produces understanding of police violence in court through a case study of the murder trial of Officer Michael Slager who shot and killed Walter Scott in North Charleston, South Carolina. While audio and video direct evidence of the moments leading up to Slager's decision to shoot was presented, cross-examination focused more explicitly on post-shooting conduct as circumstantial evidence. This approach highlights an issue for video evidence, that what is to be settled at trial may not be directly re-presented in video. Gurwitsch's notion of Gestalt and Garfinkel's adaptation thereof are proposed as an alternative means of interrogating video evidence.

Funder

Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Law,Sociology and Political Science,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference65 articles.

1. How Reasonable Is the Reasonable Man?: Police and Excessive Force

2. Visual jurisprudence: the dangers of photographic identification evidence

3. Blinder A, Fernandez M, Mueller B (2015) Use of tasers is scrutinized after Walter Scott shooting. The New York Times, 31 May. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/01/us/use-of-tasers-is-scrutinized-after-walter-scott-shooting.html?auth=login-google (accessed 28 March 2020).

4. The Social Ascription of Motives

5. Bosman J, Smith M, Wines M (2017) Jurors find video isn’t providing 20/20 vision in police shootings. The New York Times, 25 June. Available at: https://nyti.ms/2t74ew8 (accessed 25 June 2017).

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3