Development and testing of an instrument in Western Norway to measure the quality of referral information from primary care to specialised mental health care

Author:

Hartveit Miriam12,Aslaksen Aslak23,Vanhaecht Kris14,Thorsen Olav25,Hove Oddbjorn6,Haug Kjell2,Hovlid Einar7,Assmus Jorg8,Biringer Eva16

Affiliation:

1. Research Network on Integrated Health Care in Western Norway, Helse Fonna HF, Norway

2. University of Bergen, Norway

3. Haukeland University Hospital, Norway

4. Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Leuven, Belgium

5. Stavanger University Hospital, Norway

6. Section of Mental Health Research, Helse Fonna HF, Norway

7. Sognog Fjordane University College, Norway

8. Centre for Clinical Research, Haukeland University Hospital, Norway

Abstract

Introduction Several studies have indicated that medical referral letters do not convey the necessary information to ensure sufficient coordination of care. However, there is no definition of the core set of information items that should be communicated in a referral process, and no valid measurements to assess, and thus improve, the quality of such information. The present study aimed to develop and test an instrument to measure the quality of referral information provided by general practitioners to specialised mental health care services for adults. Methods Based on a recommendation taking the users’ standpoint into account, a minimum set of items for referral communication seen as essential by experienced specialists ( N = 42) was developed. An instrument to assess the quality of referral information for specialised mental health care for adults was then examined based on its psychometric properties. The examination was conducted within the region of Western Norway Regional Health Authority ( www.helse-vest.no ), representing the public specialised mental health care for approximately 1 million citizens. Results Nineteen items were recommended, and the instrument was found valid and reliable. The inter-rater correlation varied, and the test–retest was found to be substantial or almost perfect for a majority of the raters. Discussion This study embeds an exploration of improvement potential, impact of quality improvement efforts and sustainability of such efforts for facilitating effective communication in the interface between the two main health services for people with mental health problems. Further exploration on the instruments generalisability to other contexts and to the inter-rater correlation are recommended.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Policy,Leadership and Management

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3