Prevalence and use of clinical pathways in 23 countries – an international survey by the European Pathway Association

Author:

Vanhaecht Kris12,Bollmann Marcus32,Bower Kathy42,Gallagher Clare52,Gardini Andrea62,Guezo Jen72,jansen Uwe82,Massoud Rashad92,Moody Karen102,Sermeus Walter12,Van Zelm Ruben112,Whittle Claire122,Yazbeck Anne-Marie132,Zander Karen42,Panella Massimiliano142

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Health Services and Nursing Research, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;

2. European Pathway Association, Kapucijnenvoer 35, 4th floor, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.

3. SANA Kliniken, Munich, Germany;

4. Centre for Case Management, Boston, USA;

5. Patient Concern & Healthcare Events, London, England, UK;

6. International Society for Quality in Healthcare, Ancona, Italy;

7. Board of Health, Castel, Guernsey;

8. KISS Project & General practitioners part, County of Sønderjylland, Denmark;

9. Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Boston, USA;

10. Integrated Care Pathway User Group, Glasgow, Scotland, UK;

11. Institute for Healthcare Improvement CBO, Utrecht, The Netherlands;

12. School of Health Sciences, Birmingham University, Birmingham, England, UK;

13. Ministry of Health, Department for Quality, Ljubljana, Slovenia;

14. University of Eastern Piedmont ‘Amedeo Avogadro’, Novara, Italy

Abstract

Objectives To give an overview on the use and prevalence of clinical pathways. Design Cross-sectional descriptive study. Study participants European Pathway Association (E-P-A) contact persons in 23 countries. Results Clinical pathways, also known as critical pathways or integrated care pathways, have been used in health care for 20 years. Although clinical pathways are well established, little information exists on their use and dissemination around the world. The E-P-A has performed their first international survey on the use and dissemination of clinical pathways in 23 countries. At present, pathways are used with a minority of patients, mainly in acute hospital trusts. Our survey showed that clinical pathways were predominantly viewed as a multidisciplinary tool to improve the quality and efficiency of evidence-based care. Pathways were also used as a communication tool between professionals to manage and standardize outcome-oriented care. Conclusions There is a future for the use of clinical pathways, but there is a need for international benchmarking and knowledge sharing with regard to their development, implementation and evaluation.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Policy,General Medicine,Leadership and Management

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3